Employment · FLSA 11 min read

Wage and hour compliance in Texas: what the FLSA actually requires.

A November 2024 ruling from a Texas federal court vacated the Department of Labor's salary threshold increase. Most online guidance is now outdated. The current framework, the Texas Payday Law, the four-step worker classification cascade, and the financial reality of what a wage and hour violation actually costs.

Practice areas this article covers

If you read nothing else

The federal salary threshold for exempt employees in 2026 is $35,568 per year ($684 per week) — the level reverted to after a Texas federal court vacated the Department of Labor's 2024 final rule on November 15, 2024. The Highly Compensated Employee threshold reverted to $107,432. Texas does not have a separate state minimum wage or overtime statute, so the FLSA framework controls. The Texas Payday Law operates separately and governs the timing and method of wage payments — including the six-day rule for terminated employee final paychecks. Misclassification — whether of independent contractors or of non-exempt employees treated as exempt — is the most expensive form of wage and hour violation, with exposure to back wages, liquidated damages typically equal to the back wages, attorney's fees, and collective action multiplication. The cost of fixing classification proactively is consistently lower than the cost of fixing it after a claim arises.

Call Chuck Kraus: (682) 529-7177

The single most consequential development in wage and hour law in recent years was a court ruling in Sherman, Texas, on November 15, 2024. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, in State of Texas v. U.S. Department of Labor, vacated the Department of Labor's 2024 final rule that had raised the salary threshold for exempt employees in two stages — to $43,888 per year effective July 1, 2024, and to $58,656 per year scheduled for January 1, 2025. The court ruled the DOL had exceeded its statutory authority. The decision applied nationwide.

The practical effect: the salary threshold reverted to $35,568 per year — the level established by the DOL's 2019 rule. Many Texas employers had already restructured compensation to comply with the higher 2024 threshold; legally those increases are no longer required, though most employers maintained them for retention reasons. The Highly Compensated Employee threshold reverted to $107,432.

Most articles and guidance materials online still reflect the higher salary thresholds. They are out of date. The current framework — and the framework Texas employers must operate under — is the 2019 baseline. The rest of this article walks through that framework: federal FLSA, the Texas Payday Law, the four-step worker classification cascade, and the financial reality of what compliance failures actually cost.

The federal framework: what the FLSA requires

The Fair Labor Standards Act establishes the federal floor for wage and hour requirements: minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping, and youth employment standards. It is enforced by the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division. The FLSA applies to most Texas businesses, either through enterprise coverage (annual gross sales of $500,000 or more) or individual coverage (employees engaged in interstate commerce, which courts interpret broadly).

The core obligations are straightforward in concept and complicated in application. Minimum wage: $7.25 per hour federally, unchanged since 2009; Texas does not have a higher state minimum wage. Overtime: 1.5 times the regular rate for hours worked over 40 in a workweek, for non-exempt employees. Recordkeeping: contemporaneous records of hours worked, wages paid, deductions, and pay periods, retained for two to three years depending on the record type. Equal pay: prohibitions on sex-based wage discrimination for equal work.

The complication is in the classification analysis. The FLSA's protections apply to non-exempt employees. Several categories of workers — exempt employees, independent contractors, certain agricultural workers, and a handful of other narrowly defined categories — are not covered or are covered differently. Determining which category a worker belongs to is the analysis where most Texas employers either get it right or get it wrong, often for years before the question is tested.

The four-step classification cascade

The cascade below is the analytical framework I use when reviewing a Texas employer's wage and hour posture. It walks the analysis in the order that determines the answer most efficiently, with each step's outcome controlling whether the next step matters.

Classification cascade

Four sequential decisions that determine wage and hour treatment

1
Step 01 · Worker classification

Is this person an employee or an independent contractor?

The test

The federal FLSA test is the economic realities test, restated in the DOL's January 2024 final rule. Six factors, no single one determinative: (1) opportunity for profit or loss based on managerial skill; (2) investments by the worker and the employer; (3) degree of permanence of the work relationship; (4) nature and degree of control over the work; (5) extent the work is integral to the employer's business; (6) skill and initiative. Texas applies a 20-factor test for unemployment insurance and a different test for workers' compensation; the IRS applies a three-category common-law test. The same worker can be properly classified under one test and improperly classified under another.

If employee Continue to Step 02. The full FLSA framework applies.
If independent contractor FLSA does not apply, but watch for misclassification — the most common error in this category.
2
Step 02 · Salary basis & level

Is the employee paid on a salary basis at $35,568 or more per year?

The test

For an employee to qualify for any of the FLSA's white-collar exemptions, two compensation tests must be met. Salary basis: the employee receives a predetermined and fixed salary that is not subject to reduction based on the quality or quantity of work performed. Improper deductions can destroy exempt status. Salary level: the salary must be at least $684 per week ($35,568 per year), the level that became operative again after the November 2024 ruling vacated the higher 2024 thresholds. The Highly Compensated Employee alternative permits exempt status with a less stringent duties test if total annual compensation reaches $107,432.

If yes Continue to Step 03 — duties analysis determines whether the position actually qualifies.
If no The position is non-exempt. Salary alone never makes a position exempt — duties must also satisfy the test.
3
Step 03 · Duties test

Do the employee's primary duties satisfy one of the recognized exemptions?

The test

The duties analysis depends on which exemption is being claimed. Executive: primary duty is management of the enterprise or a recognized department; customarily directs the work of two or more full-time employees; has authority to hire or fire (or recommendations are given particular weight). Administrative: office or non-manual work directly related to management or general business operations; primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment on matters of significance. Professional: advanced knowledge in a field of science or learning, customarily acquired by prolonged specialized study; or work in a recognized creative or artistic field. Computer: specific computer professional duties; alternative hourly compensation method available at $27.63+ per hour. Outside sales: primary duty is making sales away from the employer's place of business. Job title is irrelevant — only actual duties performed.

If duties qualify Continue to Step 04 — confirm the classification holds in operation.
If duties don't qualify The employee is non-exempt. No salary level alone substitutes for the duties analysis.
4
Step 04 · Operational confirmation

Does the day-to-day reality match the classification on paper?

The test

A position can be designed to satisfy the duties test on paper while operating differently in practice. The "manager" who actually performs the same work as the employees they nominally supervise. The "administrative" employee whose discretion is constrained to following rules. The "professional" whose advanced education is irrelevant to the actual duties performed. The classification analysis must reflect operational reality, not the job description. Periodic review — at least annually, and whenever job responsibilities materially change — is the discipline that distinguishes employers who hold up under audit from those who do not. The DOL Wage and Hour Division and plaintiff's attorneys both look at what the employee actually does, not what the offer letter says.

Match Classification is defensible. Document the analysis and review periodically.
Mismatch Reclassify. Correcting prospectively is significantly less expensive than continuing the misclassification.

The Texas Payday Law

The Texas Payday Law, Chapter 61 of the Texas Labor Code, governs the payment of wages already earned. It does not address minimum wage or overtime — those remain governed by the FLSA. What the Texas Payday Law does is establish state-level rules for the timing, method, and recordkeeping of wage payments, with a state administrative remedy enforced by the Texas Workforce Commission.

The provisions Texas employers most often miss are the timing rules. Non-exempt employees must be paid at least twice per month, on regularly scheduled paydays. Exempt employees must be paid at least once per month. Terminated employees must receive their final wages within six calendar days of termination. Employees who resign must receive their final wages on the next regularly scheduled payday. The six-day rule is one of the most violated provisions in Texas employment law and one of the most expensive to violate, given that it triggers Texas Payday Law penalties of up to $1,000 per claim plus the unpaid wages.

Wage deductions require specific written authorization, with limited exceptions for taxes, court-ordered withholdings, and other narrow categories. Deductions for cash register shortages, customer walkouts, broken equipment, or uniforms — common in retail and hospitality — are generally not permissible without specific written authorization that meets statutory requirements, and even then are subject to limits.

Wage claims under the Texas Payday Law must be filed with the Texas Workforce Commission within 180 days of when the wages were due. The TWC investigates the claim, issues a determination, and can order the employer to pay the unpaid wages plus penalties. The same conduct that violates the Texas Payday Law typically violates the FLSA as well — and an employee whose wage claim is denied by the TWC can still pursue an FLSA claim in federal court. The two regimes operate independently.

What a violation actually costs

The cost of a wage and hour violation is not the unpaid wages alone. The FLSA's remedy structure is designed to make violations economically punitive — to incentivize compliance and to permit private enforcement at scale. The components are predictable and they compound.

Cost stack

What a wage and hour violation actually costs an employer

Back wages

Unpaid overtime, minimum wage shortfalls, or improperly withheld pay over the look-back period

2-year look-back
(3 years if willful)
Liquidated damages

Statutory damages typically equal to the back wages, unless the employer proves good-faith reliance on a reasonable basis

+100% of back wages
Attorney's fees and costs

The FLSA mandates fee-shifting — the prevailing employee recovers reasonable attorney's fees

Often exceeds
damages recovery
Pre- and post-judgment interest

Interest accrues on unpaid wages from the date they were due

Variable
Collective action multiplier

Where the violation was systemic, similarly situated employees can opt in to a single FLSA collective action

×N affected
employees
Texas Payday Law penalties

Administrative penalties up to $1,000 per claim, plus the unpaid wages, in TWC proceedings

Up to $1,000
per claim
Aggregate exposure for systemic misclassification Often 4–10× back wages
The 4–10× multiplier reflects: doubling for liquidated damages, adding attorney's fees, and applying any collective action multiplier across affected employees. Misclassification cases involving 20–50 employees over two to three years routinely produce settlements in seven figures. The cost of correcting classification proactively is a small fraction of this exposure.

The patterns that produce most violations

Wage and hour audits and litigation tend to surface the same patterns repeatedly. Identifying these patterns in advance is the most cost-effective compliance work an employer can do.

The first pattern: title-driven classification. Calling a position "manager," "supervisor," or "coordinator" and assuming exempt status without analyzing the actual duties. The DOL and plaintiff's attorneys look past titles to actual duties — and the duties test is more rigorous than employers often appreciate. A "manager" who does not regularly direct the work of two or more full-time employees and does not have meaningful hire/fire authority is not an executive exempt employee, regardless of what the offer letter says.

The second pattern: misclassified independent contractors, particularly in industries that have historically used contractor relationships — construction, transportation, professional services, technology, gig-economy operations. The economic realities test is fact-intensive and the analysis varies under federal and Texas tests. Workers classified as contractors who in fact function as employees create exposure under the FLSA, federal employment tax, Texas unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, and benefits regulation simultaneously.

The third pattern: off-the-clock work. Non-exempt employees who answer email after hours, perform pre-shift or post-shift activities (donning equipment, opening procedures, closing procedures), travel between worksites during the workday, or attend training. If the activity is for the benefit of the employer, the time is generally compensable — and the employer is responsible for tracking and paying it.

The fourth pattern: improper deductions from exempt salaries. The salary basis test is destroyed if an employer makes deductions for partial-day absences, deductions based on quality or quantity of work, or other improper deductions. A pattern of improper deductions can destroy exempt status not only for the affected employee but for similarly situated employees in the same job category.

The fifth pattern: final paycheck timing. The Texas Payday Law's six-calendar-day rule for terminated employees is more aggressive than many employers realize, and it does not contemplate exceptions for "we need to calculate final commissions" or "we need to process expense reimbursements." The wages owed are due within the window. Holding back the final paycheck pending other calculations is a Texas Payday Law violation regardless of the rationale.

The single most useful compliance discipline is the periodic classification review. The cost of running it is hours of attorney time. The cost of skipping it can be a multiple of the entire payroll for the affected category.

What a Texas employer should be doing now

Three things, in priority order. First, confirm current classification posture against the operative thresholds — $35,568 salary level, $107,432 HCE level, the duties tests for each exemption category, and the worker classification tests for any independent contractor relationships. Document the analysis. The documentation is the basis for the good-faith defense to liquidated damages if a claim arises.

Second, audit recordkeeping practices. Time records for non-exempt employees. Pay records for all employees. Deduction authorizations. Final paycheck timing for departing employees. The records that demonstrate compliance are the cheapest part of compliance and the most expensive thing to be missing in an audit or claim.

Third, address the patterns identified above. Title-driven classifications get the duties analysis done. Independent contractor relationships get reviewed under the relevant tests. Off-the-clock practices get identified and corrected. Salary basis gets confirmed against actual deduction practices. Final paycheck procedures get aligned with the six-day rule.

None of this is exotic. It is operational discipline. The Texas employers who hold up under wage and hour scrutiny are not the ones who got lucky — they are the ones who built compliance into their operations and reviewed it periodically. The employers who do not are the ones whose misclassifications accumulate quietly until something — an employee complaint, a DOL audit, a competitor's collective action — surfaces them all at once.

How I help

Wage and hour compliance is operational, and the work compounds.

My practice covers wage and hour compliance at the structural level — classification analysis, recordkeeping discipline, policy review, contractor-relationship evaluation, and the periodic review cadence that keeps compliance current as operations change. The work is part of the broader fractional general counsel relationship for many Texas businesses; for others, it operates as a defined compliance review engagement.

When wage and hour matters become contested — DOL audits, employee complaints, collective actions — Scale LLP's employment litigation team handles the litigation. The structural work and the litigation work are different in posture, and they are typically best handled by different attorneys. What stays consistent across both is the integration: the same fact pattern, the same documentation, the same analysis carried through to whichever forum the matter ends up in.

For Texas businesses that have not had a wage and hour review in the last twelve months — and particularly those that adjusted compensation in response to the 2024 DOL rule that has since been vacated — the first conversation produces a useful working direction.

Schedule a Call

Going deeper

Questions I hear from Texas employers about wage and hour compliance.

The Fair Labor Standards Act is the federal statute establishing minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping, and youth employment standards, enforced by the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division. It applies to most Texas businesses through enterprise coverage (annual gross sales of $500,000 or more, plus specific categories of employers regardless of revenue) or individual coverage (employees engaged in interstate commerce, broadly interpreted). As a practical matter, virtually every Texas business that employs people is subject to the FLSA. Texas does not have a separate state minimum wage or overtime statute, so the FLSA framework controls. The Texas Payday Law operates separately and addresses payment timing rather than wage levels.

$7.25 per hour, the federal minimum since July 24, 2009. Texas does not have a state minimum wage above the federal floor, and Texas state law preempts local minimum wage requirements above the federal level. For tipped employees, the FLSA permits a tip credit: a direct cash wage of at least $2.13 per hour, provided that tips bring total compensation to at least $7.25 per hour; if tips fall short, the employer must make up the difference. Several specific categories — certain student workers, full-time students in retail/service, workers under 20 in their first 90 days — have alternative minimum wage rules. For most Texas employees, $7.25 is the operational minimum, and many employers pay above that level for competitive reasons regardless of legal requirements.

$35,568 per year ($684 per week) — the level established by the DOL's 2019 final rule and currently operative after the November 15, 2024 ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in State of Texas v. U.S. Department of Labor, which vacated the 2024 final rule that had raised the threshold to $43,888 (effective July 1, 2024) and would have raised it further to $58,656 (January 1, 2025). The court vacated the rule on a nationwide basis, reverting the threshold to $35,568. The Highly Compensated Employee threshold also reverted to its 2019 level of $107,432. Many employers had already raised salaries to comply with the higher 2024 threshold; legally those increases are no longer required, but most employers maintained them for retention and operational reasons.

Non-exempt employees are entitled to FLSA's wage protections — minimum wage and overtime pay at 1.5 times the regular rate for hours worked over 40 in a workweek. Exempt employees are not entitled to overtime regardless of hours worked. To qualify as exempt under one of the white-collar exemptions, three tests must be satisfied: salary basis (predetermined and fixed salary not subject to reduction based on quality/quantity of work), salary level (at least $35,568/year), and duties (primary duty satisfies one of the recognized exemption categories: executive, administrative, professional, computer, or outside sales). All three tests must be met. Job title is irrelevant — the analysis is based on actual duties performed and actual compensation structure.

The Texas Payday Law, Chapter 61 of the Texas Labor Code, governs the payment of wages by Texas employers and is administered by the Texas Workforce Commission. It addresses timing and method of wage payments — non-exempt employees paid at least twice per month, exempt at least once per month, terminated employees within six calendar days of termination, resigning employees by next regular payday — and provides a state administrative remedy for unpaid wages. Wage deductions require specific written authorization. The TWC accepts wage claims within 180 days of when wages were due. Penalties include unpaid wages plus administrative penalties up to $1,000 per claim. The Texas Payday Law operates alongside the FLSA — a wage violation can be pursued under both regimes.

The federal FLSA test is the economic realities test, restated by the DOL in January 2024. Six factors with no single one determinative: opportunity for profit/loss based on managerial skill; investments by worker and employer; permanence of relationship; control over the work; integral nature of work to employer's business; skill and initiative. Texas applies different tests for different state purposes — the Texas Workforce Commission applies a 20-factor test for unemployment insurance; the Texas Department of Insurance applies a different test for workers' compensation; the IRS applies a three-category common-law test for federal tax. A worker can be properly classified under one test and improperly under another. Misclassification creates exposure under multiple regimes simultaneously. The classification analysis should be done under each applicable test, documented contemporaneously, and reviewed periodically.

Wage and hour misclassification creates exposure across several dimensions. FLSA: back wages, liquidated damages typically equal to back wages (effectively doubling recovery), employee's reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest. Two-year statute of limitations, extended to three years for willful violations. Multiplied in collective actions where similarly situated employees opt in. Beyond FLSA: Texas Payday Law penalties, federal and state employment tax assessments, workers' compensation premium adjustments, benefit plan corrections. Aggregate exposure for systemic misclassification involving even small employee numbers can run into seven figures. The cost of correcting classification proactively is consistently lower than the cost of correcting it after a DOL audit, employee complaint, or collective action.

For non-exempt employees: full name and Social Security number; address with ZIP; birth date if under 19; gender and occupation; time and day workweek begins; hours worked each day and total each workweek; basis of pay; regular hourly rate; total daily/weekly straight-time earnings; total overtime earnings; all additions to or deductions from wages; total wages paid each pay period; date of payment and pay period covered. For exempt employees, the requirements are more limited but still substantial. Records must be kept three years for payroll records, two years for records on which wage computations are based (time cards, work schedules). Records must be available for DOL inspection. In a wage audit or litigation, the absence of contemporaneous records works against the employer — courts apply a relaxed evidentiary standard for the employee. Recordkeeping is the cheapest part of compliance and the most expensive thing to be missing when a claim arises.

Classification reviewed proactively
is a small fraction of the cost of fixing it later.

The first conversation identifies whether your current posture is defensible against the operative thresholds and audit standards, and what — if anything — needs to be addressed before the next claim or DOL inquiry surfaces it.

This article describes the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and Texas Payday Law frameworks at a general level and is not legal advice for any specific situation. Wage and hour analysis is fact-specific and depends on the employer's industry, the employee's actual duties, the compensation structure, and other circumstances that cannot be evaluated in a general article. Statutory references and salary thresholds reflect the law as of the publication date and are subject to change through legislation, regulation, or judicial decision. Consult an attorney licensed in Texas before making classification or compliance decisions. Chuck Kraus is licensed in Texas, Minnesota, Washington State, and Canada.